Thought Search Articles.

What We Don't Know About The Water Restoration Act

By : Gayelord Nash 9 or more times read

Submitted: 2008-10-26 16:16:06     Number of Times Read: 12    
Water is one of the basic needs people. For this particular reason, many municipalities put a lot of effort in protecting their source of water. When there's trouble it's the water restoration process that save the day. The government has a tremendous amount of responsability preserving the nation's water reservoirs.

You may know about the Water Restoration Act. Before this bill was introduced in May 2007, it was known as The Clean Water Act (CWA). In order to preserve the nation's water reservoir, The Clean Water Act (CAW) was passed in 1972. The bill protects the "navigable waters of the United States". Under this law, polluting the waters under the jurisdiction of the country is a crime. However, defining what embodies a "pollutant" or the scope of "navigable waters" has often left the authorities uncertain and property owners in no win situations.

Take for example the case of one father and son in Florida. They were penalized and imprisoned for 21 months for filling a presumed marshy low-lying area on their property in transgression of The Clean Water Act. The perturbing thing about the case discovered by a district court judge is that the two were apprehended for placing clean fill loam on a lot of subdivided dry land.

It was just a few years back; the U.S Supreme Court outlined the irregularity of federal regulators when handling wetlands under the Act, which environmentalist strongly oppose.

In May 2007, Congressman James Oberstar revised Clean Water Act to correct the inaccuracy and introduced the "Water Restoration Act". In this revised bill, the term "navigable waters of the United States" was substituted with "waters of the United States".

This new term in the Water Restoration Act raised a lot of questions especially in the environmental sector. Environmental organizations believe that this just re-established the first intent of the Act. Opposers of the Water Restoration Act, however, believe that the revision does not change the original content but rather significantly expand the ambit of the Clean Water Act. It threatens property rights and generates even more uncertainty concerning the federal prerogative of the Act.

Opponents of the Water Restoration Act claim that federalizing all sources of inland and costal waters will give the federal government control over all water in the country which may result to its privatization. This Act will provide the underlying basis for the corporate privatization with the assurance of Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). In effect, this would transform the whole source of water supply into commodity status.

Noticeably, the World Bank and United Nation are seen active in an attempt to employ both NAFTA and CAFTA in transforming the global water supply to commodity status with private investors to be the key players in global trade.

If the World Trade Organization succeeds in converting water to tradable commodity status, giant corporations and investors will have a favorable position of controlling this tradable commodity under international trade policies.

Privatization will end community or individual right to water and all source of it. Privatization may steer to exploitation. This is the side of Water Restoration Act that we should be aware of.
Gayelord Nash distributes articles and information on fire and water for Denver Carpet Water Extraction and Detroit Emergency Water Restoration
Article Directory: http://ThoughtSearch.com - Article Must Retain Author Resource for Reprint!
 
 
[Valid RSS feed]  Thought Search Category Rss Feed - http://thoughtsearch.com/rss.php?rss=92
[Valid RSS feed]  Gayelord Nash's Author Feed - http://thoughtsearch.com/author-rss-feed.php?rss=7416
- Related Articles -
- Thought Search Articles -

Article use is considered your agreement of our Terms of Service.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Thanks for visiting Thought Search

Copyright © 2009 Thought Search Directories Group

Article Wild | Article Mind | Wizdom Search Articles | Fully Explained How-To Articles
New Members
Select
Sign up
Select
Terms of Service
Select
Author Guidelines
Select
Privacy Policy
Navigation
Select
Login
Select
Top Articles
Select
Contact Us
Select
RSS Feeds
This Article
 
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
 
Subscribe.Get Articles by Email
 
Printer Print This Article
 
Follow us on Twitter
 
Share
 
Partners
 
 
Contact ThoughtSearch.net
 
Categories
Arts
Automotive
Business
Career
Computers
Culture and Society
Education
Environment
Family Concerns
Finances
Fitness
Food and Drinks
Gardening
Health
Hobbies
Holidays
House and Home
Internet
Internet Business
Legal
Outdoors
Personal Development
Pets and Animals
Politics
Publishing
Recreation and Leisure
Relationships
Religion
Speaking
Sports
Technology
Travel
Wise Consumer
Writing

 

Powered by Article Friendly | Hostgator -Is Our Host!